<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Indrap Learning Limited | Jennifer Stevenson | Activity</title>
	<link>https://pdl.indrap.org/members/jenniferstevenson/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://pdl.indrap.org/members/jenniferstevenson/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Jennifer Stevenson.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 17:54:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a5e72bece882fc62f423f0ab5a2616bf</guid>
				<title>Jennifer Stevenson started the topic What Makes Animation Really ‘Cartoony’? in the forum Competency Based Training For TB Surge And Laboratory Staff</title>
				<link>https://pdl.indrap.org/forums/topic/what-makes-animation-really-cartoony/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 16:43:50 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was talking to a friend about how some animations feel too stiff to be called “cartoon” and it sparked this thought—what makes something truly cartoony? Is it exaggerated motion, expressive faces, or comedic timing? I’ve come across <a href="https://www.videojeeves.com/cartoon-animation" rel="nofollow ugc">cartoon animation services</a> that focus on nailing that rubber-hose bounce or squash-and-stretch motion. It’s no&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-162507"><a href="https://pdl.indrap.org/forums/topic/what-makes-animation-really-cartoony/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>